Is Transgenderism Just the Milgram Experiment Hiding Behind a Veneer of “Kindness”?
Forcing people to behave badly to others hurts us all
Stanley Milgram, born in 1933 was an American psychologist, best known for his controversial experiments on obedience conducted in the 1960s during his professorship at Yale. Both his parents were Jews who had immigrated to the USA from Europe following WWI; members of his family who remained in Europe were held in the concentration camps in WWII where some of them perished.
His experiments started three months after the start of the trial of German Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. He was interested in the concept that many Nazis claimed to be merely “following orders”, even in the face of the obvious harms to others. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience.
His experiments clearly demonstrated that average citizens could be easily forced to obey directives that they thought were causing harm to others, up to and including their deaths. To learn more about the Milgram experiments this video provides an informative overview.
Transgenderism is the Milgram experiment writ large
There were three participants in the Milgram experiments, but only one subject as the other two were actors hired to play their parts. The subjects were not aware of this as they were told that the purpose of these experiments was to test memory. They also believed that they were randomly assigned to be the teacher or the learner, but this was rigged so that they were always the teacher (and by extension, the authority figure).
For the transgender lobby of today, they are the teachers, and we are assigned as the learners. Failing to acknowledge that people can change not only their gender, but also their sex, we learners are subjected to increasing levels of irritation, bullying, disapproval, canceling, de-platforming and generally appalling behavior from our teachers, who see themselves as the authority figures in charge of, well, nearly everything in Western, progressive societies.
“But no one tells me what to believe!”
Most adults believe they are autonomous decision makers who, when faced with a choice, have a look at the situation, examine the evidence from different angles and do what we think is right or best at the time.
The autonomous state requires us to not only direct our actions, but to take responsibility for them and for any unfavorable consequences that may arise as a result of what we have done.
Conversely, when in an agentic state we allow others to give orders that we feel compelled to obey. The agentic state is a psychological phenomenon in which an individual gives up their autonomy and moral responsibility to an authority figure. In this state, we perceive ourselves as an agent of the authority figure and are willing to carry out their commands, even if it goes against our own moral code.
If, after completion of any instructions something goes wrong, we shift the responsibility to the one who gave those orders because we have handed over our agency to another person’s will. Hence, the Nazis’ statements in court that they were just “following orders”, which from their viewpoint, exonerated them from any blame for negative consequences, such as over six million people dying at their hands.
Two things must be in place for the agentic state to function: the person giving the orders must be perceived as being qualified to give orders and seen as a legitimate source of authority, and it is believed by the person carrying out the commands that the authority figure will take responsibility for any adverse consequences.
“Trans women are women!” Our choice; agree or receive a metaphorical electric shock
The entire trans edifice is built on the foundation of sand that is gender ideology. This posits that we can choose our sex at will (and even without a single medical consultation or “treatment”) our sex is what we declare it to be, regardless of our embodied reality.
Why sex is the only characteristic that this applies to remains a mystery to me. It is not possible to identify into a different race or ethnicity, age or as another species. I can’t identify as a global super model (and get the world to agree) and if I try to work as a doctor because I identify as one, I could end up in prison for practicing medicine without the qualifications or the license.
The most fundamental characteristic we have is our sex, which is immutable and fixed at fertilization, but somehow, we are now told that this is not true. Many adults (and even worse, children) are now placed in the position where we have to play pretend or chance losing our jobs, volunteer positions and our very communities and social networks.
Often this is presented as a human rights issue, like gay marriage and removing other legal barriers to living as a same sex attracted person in our society.
This is not true. Gay rights never impinged on anyone else’s rights in any way. Gay couples being allowed to marry and to exercise the same rights and privileges that everyone else has was largely smoothly integrated into most Western nations. Trans rights on the other hand, are in direct opposition to women’s rights and if you can’t see why, reading this and this may help to fill you in.
Performance artists insist on constant applause
One thing that men in womanface really hate is uppity women not accepting them as sisters. Trans is the ultimate performance art lifestyle because there is no off stage. To be trans is to be always “on”, but it really only works if there is continuous applause as I wrote about here.
The vitriolic hatred aimed at the megastar author J. K. Rowling is an obvious example of this.
No one has ever uncovered anything that Rowling has said or written that is transphobic. Standing up for the rights of women is not transphobic. This author was tasked with writing an article “to prove” that Rowling is transphobic, but after exhaustive research, she came up with zip, nada, nothing.
The UK is colloquially referred to as TERF Island due to some high-profile push back in the workplace against the well-funded juggernaut that is the trans lobby. At least four major court cases have been found in favor of women who were fired from their jobs because they refused to toe the trans party line that “trans women are women” or they had doubts about the wisdom of unquestioning affirmation of a gender identity in children.
Not content with male privilege in our patriarchal society, some men cheat their way to victory pretending to be women
Very few people would disagree with a statement about the status of women under patriarchy. I mean, that’s the whole point of separately sexed categories for everything from sports to literary prizes. It’s an attempt at fairness.
But now, the ever-growing number of natal males winning “Women of the Year” prizes has escalated beyond some niche backwater to nearly ubiquitous. Here is list of at least eight men who shoved women off of being considered sufficiently distinguished to win an award designated for women:
This list is in no way comprehensive; nearly any women’s category of any competition, prize or award will include a natal male vying to win a place in the spotlight.
Of course, the most obvious example of men cheating their way to victory can be seen in the sporting arena (where “being a good sport” until recently meant playing fairly). Now, “being a good sport” means that girls and women are expected to gracefully lose to boys and men, who have physical and physiological advantages that can’t be overcome by any amount of training, hard work or effort.
Here Veronica Ivy (a cheating male sports star), explains why he has no advantages over his female competitors. His ignorance is clearly greater than his sporting victories.
Milgram was right - people can be manipulated to harm others
One difference between Milgram’s subjects and everyone today is that those sitting in that basement room at Yale accepted the actor telling them that they had to proceed with the experiment (despite the anguished cries from the “shocked” actor) as a legitimate authority figure that had to be obeyed. They were able to successfully offload any guilt they felt onto the person issuing the orders.
Well, the transgender community and trans rights allies may be fine with going along with the mutilation of children and the removal of all safeguarding for women that the trans agenda is built on, but when the day of reckoning comes about, I for one, will not let them get away with saying, “but I was just following orders”. The judges at Nuremberg rejected the “following orders” defense and we should not accept this either.
These are just men--there's one kind.
Humans do not have "gender." Only words have gender because it's a linguistics term.
This whole thing is a fraud. All of it. There's no such thing as "transgender" athletes. They're men who get off on abusing women. It's the oldest truth in the book. Male stupidity distilled into its purest form.
If women didn’t wear dresses and make up and do all that stuff that seems to make us women, and society was completely different. What would then make the men in dresses and make up women? Seen as they think that it is those things that make you a woman 🤔. Brings us back to that question. “What is a woman?” #adulthumanfemale!